Unfortunately, they were born in Georgia
Archive for November, 2011|Monthly archive page
Family
In love on November 24, 2011 at 8:02 am
some of them dared to be well …
Together, we raised the dog…
Mud, Stones, Black hands – We built a house
(But)
Nobody wanted to live there…
Wanton’s songs from the radio,
Coffee with stimulator,
Fragments from the old romances,
tablets, Dylan music, erotic stories – and you…
All you …
It was not love,
Not phobias,
not hope,
Neither past, nor future,
Just and only;
Dirty pieces from the happy life…
Dead Chicken Theory in the IR
In international relations, politics, Uncategorized on November 21, 2011 at 12:51 amGeneral Action Scheme – How can I get my chicken?
1I am hungry and I want to eat a chicken
“Hunger” and “Chicken” are linked with my action, but this action is not just “eating,” it is “an action for the action,” I kill chicken to eat, that’s a double action (killing is an action + eating that is also an action), my Idea is not to kill the chicken (if I am not a chicken killer), motive of this action is in my “hungriness” and the goal is to reach the chicken to have a good dinner.
So, planned action and goal often exist independently (killing of the chicken is not my goal – though it is finished action). Instead of killing that poor chicken i could go and buy one, that means somebody else had already killed chicken for me, but he/she did it also with different motivation, his actions will earn him money to live.
Actually there is nothing pleasant in killing animals, if that “killer guy” could win a million USD in lottery there is 90% chance that he had quieted that chicken-slaughter forever.
If I open the refrigerator and I found a piece of chicken I won’t even think to go to buy or kill a village hen.
As for conclusion I’d like to say that every kind of action could be compensated by the other actions if the motives and goals are the same for each.
Other parts of the “Dead Chicken Theory” will prove that it really works in the modern IR system, i will have some case studies and theoretical discussions about behavioral interdependence and action patterns that create fixed motif environments.
détente, s’il vous plait!
In love, news on November 19, 2011 at 10:25 pmToday I meet an atomic bomb.
More advanced than that one in Hiroshima and Nagasaki,
Japanese people are lucky,
but what about me?
détente, s’il vous plait
From here to eternity..2012
In news, politics on November 19, 2011 at 3:51 amThere is a guy, Who is not a guy, who is not a woman and maybe, he is not a human, who speaks a lot, eats a lot and wants everything around…
Just like US government, invades Afghanistan and Iraq, he goes for a peanut butter and sausage.
What is his name, his surname or nationality? He is an unidentified living object, subject or even adverb…
If we take him on the roof top of a tall building, he will jump – definitely will do, Cause he believes in Cant and the idea of the universal values, he believes that happiness of millions is more important than his dead body, maybe his bloody corpse is not a very interesting thing to see but bench of idiots will gather around him to discuss if he was lesbian or gay, paranoid or alcoholic, melancholic or pessimist, leftist or rightist, dentist or psychiatrist, finally ambulance will take him in the morgue and still the same, doctors and nurses will start to investigate things about him, one on them will write in the report that:
“There is a guy, Who is not a guy, who is not a woman and maybe, he is not a human, who used to speak a lot , eat a lot and wanted everything around him…he has five sausages in his stomach and fragments of the American peanut butter in the rectum. He is a former US military officer, he was in Afghanistan and Iraq, but his insurance can’t cover funeral taxes. We hope that his spirit will rest in peace.”
Don’t worry 2012 will come soon.